In this episode, Ben Ferguson examines the IRGC’s appeal to American voters, the economic pressures facing Iran, and the regime’s apparent calculation that political changes in Washington could alter U.S. policy. He also reviews congressional investigations into birth tourism agencies and discusses testimony regarding the scope of the industry and its potential implications. The conversation then shifts to Washington, where Democrats are reportedly developing proposals aimed at reversing institutional and policy changes made during President Trump’s second term. Ferguson analyzes efforts involving presidential emergency powers, federal workforce protections, Justice Department independence, and broader debates over executive authority. 

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has issued a public letter urging Americans to oppose President Donald Trump in the upcoming midterm elections, raising new questions about foreign influence, U.S.-Iran relations, and the political stakes of the next election cycle. At the same time, investigations into birth tourism agencies are drawing attention on Capitol Hill. Rep. Brandon Gill has warned that ongoing probes into companies that assist foreign nationals seeking U.S. birthright citizenship for their children could be halted if Democrats regain control of the House. The debate has expanded to concerns about visa fraud, national security, and allegations involving Chinese Communist Party-linked individuals using birth tourism programs. 

Topics Covered:

• The IRGC’s public letter urging Americans to oppose Donald Trump
• Iran’s economic challenges, sanctions pressure, and the Strait of Hormuz
• Congressional investigations into birth tourism agencies
• Concerns about visa fraud and Chinese-linked birth tourism networks
• Democratic proposals to limit presidential powers and restructure government authority
• The debate over the federal bureaucracy, executive power, and post-Trump governance

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the 47 Morning Update w Ben Ferguson, Ben welcomes Senator Ted Cruz to discuss media coverage of Abdul El-Sayed, NBC’s follow-up interview questioning his previous denials regarding family connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, and the political impact of allegations involving donors, family members, and organizations cited by critics of his campaign. They also examine the Texas Senate race, analyzing James Talarico’s stated positions on immigration, energy, climate policy, agriculture, and transgender-related medical care for minors, while arguing those issues could become defining contrasts for voters in the upcoming election cycle.

Questions surrounding Abdul El-Sayed and Michigan’s U.S. Senate race moved back into the spotlight after a new national television interview revisited allegations about his family’s past associations and prior public statements. Following criticism of an earlier media interview, a subsequent exchange focused on social media posts attributed to El-Sayed’s half-sister and renewed debate over his response to questions regarding the Muslim Brotherhood.At the same time, the hosts turn their attention to another closely watched Senate contest in Texas, where they argue that candidate James Talarico's positions on gender-related medical treatments for minors, immigration, energy policy, and climate issues reflect a broader ideological divide shaping the 2026 midterm elections.

Topics Covered:

• NBC’s follow-up interview with Abdul El-Sayed and questions about prior statements regarding the Muslim Brotherhood
• Social media posts attributed to El-Sayed’s half-sister and the ensuing political controversy
• Debate over campaign donors, family associations, and transparency in the Michigan Senate race
• James Talarico’s positions on transgender-related medical care for minors
• Immigration and pathway-to-citizenship proposals discussed in the Texas Senate contest
• Energy, oil and gas, climate policy, and agriculture as major campaign issues

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson discuss Cruz’s interview with Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, debate claims about Russia’s economic strength, reflect on the moral case for the Allied victory in World War II, and examine the Senate candidacies of Abdul El-Sayed and James Talarico. The conversation covers allegations regarding the Muslim Brotherhood, national security concerns, immigration policy, energy production, transgender medical treatments for minors, agriculture, and the political implications of these issues in key elections.

A wide-ranging conversation on Russia, World War II, free markets, and two closely watched Senate campaigns leads to a broader debate about ideology, national security, and the future direction of American politics. Drawing on an interview with Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, Senator Ted Cruz argues that defending free societies, constitutional government, and economic freedom remains as important today as in past global conflicts.The episode also examines claims about Russia’s economy, debates over the legacy of communism, and criticism of public figures whom Cruz says have promoted favorable narratives about Vladimir Putin and authoritarian systems. Cruz and Ben Ferguson contrast economic performance in Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States while discussing the role of free enterprise in generating prosperity.

Topics Covered:

• Debate over Russia’s economy versus the United Kingdom and the role of GDP and GDP per capita measurements
• Senator Cruz’s interview with Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg on World War II, freedom, and constitutional government
• Discussion of the Muslim Brotherhood and allegations concerning Abdul El-Sayed’s family and political connections
• National security concerns raised about access to classified information by elected officials
• James Talarico’s positions on immigration, transgender medical treatments for minors, and social policy
• Energy, oil and gas, climate policy, agriculture, cattle ranching, and their impact on jobs and the economy

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: https://x.com/tedcruz

X: 

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson examine whistleblower allegations regarding donor information collected during the Arctic Frost investigation, discuss oversight efforts led by Chuck Grassley, and explore reports surrounding a federal investigation involving Ilhan Omar. The conversation focuses on government accountability, privacy concerns, investigative powers, campaign donor records, and the broader political implications of these developing stories.

New whistleblower allegations released through statements by Chuck Grassley have sparked debate over the scope of data collected during the federal investigation tied to Donald Trump. The claims center on whether information from hundreds of thousands of Republican donors, supporters, and campaign merchandise purchasers was obtained as part of investigative efforts, raising questions about privacy, government authority, and political activity.Later in the program, attention turns to reports surrounding Ilhan Omar, including a federal criminal investigation referenced in media coverage, questions about citizenship-related records, and long-running controversies involving personal and political matters. Throughout the discussion, the host argues that Americans deserve greater transparency regarding both investigations and how government agencies exercised their authority.

Topics Covered:

• Whistleblower allegations about donor records obtained during the Arctic Frost investigation
• Claims involving data from Trump donors, supporters, and campaign merchandise purchasers
• Oversight efforts and disclosures discussed by Chuck Grassley
• Questions surrounding investigative scope, privacy, and federal subpoena authority
• Reports of a federal criminal investigation involving Ilhan Omar
• Debate over citizenship records, public disclosures, and political accountability

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the 47 Morning Update w Ben Ferguson, Ben examines the growing political battle surrounding Abdul El-Sayed’s Senate campaign, Mike Rogers’ accusations regarding campaign donors and family associations, media coverage of the controversy, and newly highlighted social media posts attributed to El-Sayed’s half-sister. They discuss how the issue could affect one of the country’s most closely watched Senate races, debate questions surrounding transparency and political judgment, and analyze the broader implications for national politics and voter perceptions heading into the midterm elections.

A new controversy has emerged in Michigan’s U.S. Senate race after Republican candidate Mike Rogers intensified attacks on Democratic nominee Abdul El-Sayed over alleged ties involving family members, political donors, and organizations Rogers associates with the Muslim Brotherhood and other extremist-linked groups. The dispute escalated following a debate between the two candidates, where Rogers challenged El-Sayed over campaign funding and alleged associations. El-Sayed has publicly denied that he or his family have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and has argued that criticisms of him are rooted in attacks on his faith and background. 

Topics Covered:

• The debate exchange between Mike Rogers and Abdul El-Sayed
• Allegations involving campaign donations and donor affiliations
• El-Sayed’s denial of family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood
• Social media posts attributed to El-Sayed’s half-sister
• NBC’s Meet the Press interview with Kristen Welker
• The potential impact of the controversy on Michigan’s Senate race

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz, Senator Ted Cruz and Ben Ferguson commemorate the legacy of Milton Friedman before turning to what they describe as two of the most consequential Senate races in the country. They discuss media coverage of Abdul El-Sayed, debate the significance of questions surrounding the Muslim Brotherhood, examine James Tallarico’s policy positions, and argue that the outcome of these elections could shape energy, immigration, education, and cultural policy for years to come. The conversation concludes with a look at President Trump’s Alaska rally, support for Senator Dan Sullivan’s reelection campaign, and Trump’s decision to pardon three Alaska diesel mechanics previously convicted in a federal Clean Air Act case.

Fifty years after Milton Friedman received the Nobel Prize in Economics, Senator Ted Cruz reflects on the economist’s enduring influence on free-market thought, school choice, and economic policy. The discussion begins with a classic televised exchange between Friedman and Phil Donahue, highlighting arguments for capitalism that Cruz says remain relevant today.The episode then shifts to two highly contested 2026 Senate races, focusing on media coverage, candidate scrutiny, immigration policy, energy production, and cultural debates. Cruz and Ben Ferguson argue that recent reporting surrounding Abdul El-Sayed changed after questions were raised about his past statements, family associations, and public record. They also examine the Texas Senate race, discussing James Tallarico's positions on transgender-related policies, immigration, energy, and agriculture.

Topics Covered:

• The 50th anniversary of Milton Friedman's Nobel Prize and his defense of free-market capitalism
• Friedman’s influence on school choice and education reform
• Media coverage and scrutiny of Abdul El-Sayed and allegations concerning Muslim Brotherhood connections
• The Texas Senate race and debate over James Tallarico's positions on social and cultural issues
• Immigration, amnesty proposals, and border policy disagreements
• President Donald Trump's Alaska rally, energy development, and pardons for Alaska diesel mechanics

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz

X: 

In this episode of the Ben Ferguson Show Podcast, Ben discusses claims surrounding debanking practices, a reported OCC review of major U.S. banks, the role of federal regulators, and the broader implications for free speech, religious liberty, financial access, energy producers, firearms businesses, and politically active organizations. The conversation also explores whether new legislative protections are needed to prevent future administrations from influencing banking access based on ideology or lawful business activity.

A new review from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is at the center of a debate over whether federal regulators pressured major financial institutions to restrict banking services for certain customers based on political, religious, or industry affiliations. The discussion focuses on reported concerns involving firearms businesses, energy companies, religious organizations, and conservative groups. Ben Ferguson examines allegations that federal regulators under the Obama and Biden administrations used regulatory pressure to influence banking decisions. He argues that large banks faced significant regulatory risks and that concerns over "reputation risk" policies contributed to account closures, lending restrictions, and other banking limitations affecting lawful organizations and businesses.

Topics Covered:

• The reported OCC review and findings involving major U.S. banks and debanking concerns. 
• "Reputation risk" policies and their impact on banking relationships.
• Claims involving firearms manufacturers, gun retailers, and Second Amendment businesses. 
• Energy sector concerns, including oil, gas, coal, and financing access.
• Religious organizations, pro-life groups, and allegations of viewpoint-based banking decisions. 
• Whether Congress should establish stronger protections against politically motivated debanking.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the 47 Morning Update w Ben Ferguson, Ben examines the whistleblower allegations surrounding the federal investigation known as Arctic Frost, the expansion from thousands of donor records to claims involving hundreds of thousands of individuals, and the broader debate over whether government investigators exceeded appropriate boundaries while pursuing matters related to the 2020 election and Donald Trump. They discuss constitutional concerns, donor privacy, political participation, and the questions they believe the Department of Justice should answer regarding the collection and handling of these records.

New allegations from Chuck Grassley contend that records tied to at least 639,000 Republican donors, voters, and supporters were obtained during the federal investigation connected to Donald Trump. The claim raises questions about the scope of government subpoena powers, political privacy, and how donor information was collected and used.The controversy centers on whistleblower information highlighted by Grassley, who argues that investigators gathered data extending far beyond individuals directly connected to the case. According to the discussion, the records allegedly included donor information, personal identifying details, political contribution histories, and information related to campaign merchandise purchases.

Topics Covered:

• Chuck Grassley's disclosure of whistleblower allegations involving at least 639,000 Republican donors and supporters.
• The FBI investigation known as Arctic Frost and its connection to the special counsel investigation led by Jack Smith.
• Claims that donor records, contribution histories, and personal information were obtained through subpoenas.
• Questions about the collection of information related to Trump campaign merchandise purchases.
• Debate over whether records dating back to 2005 were relevant to an investigation focused on the 2020 election.
• Concerns about political privacy, government transparency, and First Amendment participation in the political process.

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of Ben Ferguson, Ben discusses President Trump’s Alaska visit, the reopening of oil and gas development opportunities in Alaska, proposed natural gas infrastructure projects, military investments tied to Arctic strategy, and the role of critical minerals in national security. They also compare U.S. government spending debates with developments in the United Kingdom, arguing that expanding welfare and disability benefit programs can create long-term fiscal and workforce challenges if left unchecked.

President Donald Trump’s trip to Alaska becomes the focal point of a larger debate over energy production, national security, and the fight for control of the U.S. Senate. The discussion examines how Alaska’s oil, natural gas, critical minerals, and military significance fit into the administration’s broader political and economic strategy.The episode also explores the argument that expanding domestic energy production could lower costs, strengthen energy independence, and reduce reliance on foreign suppliers. At the same time, the hosts discuss the political stakes of a key Alaska Senate race and why they believe control of the chamber could hinge on a handful of competitive contests around the country.

Topics Covered:

• President Trump’s Alaska trip and its connection to a critical Senate race
• Oil, natural gas, and the debate over American energy independence
• Alaska pipeline proposals and foreign investment in energy infrastructure
• Arctic military readiness and Alaska’s national security importance
• Critical minerals, supply chains, and competition with China
• The United Kingdom’s welfare and disability-benefit spending challenges as a cautionary example for the United States

Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening

X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.